

It's homemade, because I combined the two, therefore it is my creation.Īt this point, YouTube is considered akin to television- public media.
#KARAOKE SUBTITLE CREATION GANH TV#
So I can take an Eagles song I found online, add it to a video of dogs copulating from YouTube (I'm sure there's one there- seems to have everything, from what I'm told), and put it on some TV channel that would have it as a dog food commercial- and have absolutely no worries about litigation. He bought the instrumental & totally MADE the graphics to sync up with the song in the proper places.

To say something is not homemade just because he didn't actually record the instrumental & write the words is silly. You could produce and sell your made from scratch cookies as your own, but if Pilsbury catches you doing the same with their product, you can be certain of a lawsuit- which you would lose. If, however, the sangria was produced for public consumption, and touted specific brands on the label in regard to it's ingredients, the producer would have to receive permissions to do so. On the other hand, the Sangria is home MADE because it is created from recipe of ingredients, like scratchmade cookies, and for personal use. Your second sets of cookies are home-BAKED. : made in the home and not in a factory, store, etc. You can buy a chocolate chip cookie from a store or bakery - or make them at home either from scratch or from a Pillsbury tube (already made but not cooked) - doesn't matter, the latter two are homemade! Same with someone making their own graphics to an instrumental to make it a karaoke cdg. Homemade doesn't mean anything of the sort? If he took the time to make something that isn't commerically available - even if he BOUGHT an already made instrumental and created the graphics, swipes, sync'ing them, etc. I have created a few tracks using Karaoke Master doing just this- ENTIRELY my own creations ( though I have to admit my creations are not ever going to be seen or heard in public- not good. HOMEMADE karaoke means YOUR original music composition, lyrics that YOU wrote, your sweep of those lyrics, and images that YOU created.Īny and every part of a track created by someone else requires their permission to use- at least in ( or in the case of YouTube- "on") a public setting. It took me lots of hours to make these videos unlike some postings on you tube where they have taken a Sound Choice or another manufacture's video, chopped off the front title page and the end page then made up their own and passed it off as being theirs.ġ) Per my original post, I would call it "Not really homemade, but rather a compilation of others' creations."Īs for the rest, Jim Harrington- above- nailed it. I listened to the original song to see where the lyrics come in and typed all the lyrics in myself. I looked up all of the lyrics and matched them to the original song. Sure, I may used have an image in the video and paid for the instrumental but I made all of the video myself. This is in response to JoeCharteuse reply.ġ) If it's not "Home Made" karaoke what would you call it. It really doesn't matter how many hours you spent making the videos if you don't have the necessary permissions.
#KARAOKE SUBTITLE CREATION GANH LICENSE#
That requires a license from the music publisher-and probably from the company that made the sound recording. You may have paid for a copy of the sound recording, but you don't seem to have paid for the right to make an audiovisual work out of the music, or to make copies of the music. It took me lots of hours to make these videos unlike some postings on you tube where they have taken a Sound Choice or another manufacture's video, chopped off the front title page and the end page then made up their own and passed it off as being theirs. If it's not "Home Made" karaoke what would you call it. This is in response to JoeCharteuse reply.
